Tuesday, March 20, 2007

soulgroups

this blog is 100% inspired by becky’s comment on brian’s posting (thanks guys!!)

i’ve never been one to believe in soulmates or the whole one-person-for-everybody gig in a romantic sense. like becky, i think your soulmate doesn’t necessarily have to be your lover…at least i hope that’s not the case, because i already met mine and i definitely don’t foresee a marriage – damn you, danny! i do, however, think that everybody has a soulgroup…any given person is compatible with a select group, say a dozen – give or take a lot – of potential mates.

i picture it like this: let’s say i go to the store to buy some new socks. i’m not compatible with all the socks in the store - i can immediately eliminate any sissy and girly socks, gross and unkempt socks, ugly (in my opinion) socks, and any socks that just don’t fit right – too tall, too short, bad teeth… that leaves me with my soulgroup of socks. i could choose any one of those socks and be fairly happy. maybe i’ll have some buyers’ remorse, but who doesn’t with all the sock options these days?

5 comments:

sugarcube said...

It seems to me that a certain person has yet to find 'the perfect pair of socks'. You'll believe in soulmates once you do.

punk rock girl said...

i dont know if agree that you can choose your soulmate or soulgroup or soulanything. i am leaning towards if there is such a thing as your soul mating with something else you cant help it.you cant help who your soul likes. thats why its better to be a vampire. they have no souls and get to like whoever they want.

ck said...

yeah...good point. i could buy into the fact that maybe the socks find you - sounds like a sequel to "sisterhood of the travelling pants" is in order

also, maybe i haven't found the perfect pair of socks yet because i'd rather go barefoot - socks are restricting

sugarcube said...

so is dating

ck said...

you catch on quick suga